اینجانب با آشنایی و اطلاع از مقررات حقوقی بین المللی و همچنین سابقه وکالت در زمینه های اجرای آرا خارجی در دادگاه های داخلی و خارجی و انجام امور وکالت در موضوعات داوری کشورهای مختلف اروپایی و خاورمیانه ( آلمان، فرانسه، ترکیه، امارات متحده عربی و عمان…) آماده ارائه خدمات حقوقی به شما می باشم.
اجرای رای و حکم دادگاه های ایران در امارات/ دبی
Simplifying and contributing to the judicial nexus worldwide: In a globalised era, where business
operations transcend geographical boundaries, countries and governments enter into bilateral/multilateral
conventions or treaties to aid reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.
With people and assets easily operating across borders, there are a multitude of disputes
affecting corporates and PSUs that span multifarious jurisdictions. In this regard, another astounding
foresightedness championed with prodigious effort, has orchestrated the United
Arab Emirates as an integral part of the international comity.
The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments has
garnered great practical significance across all legal frameworks over the
decades, and continues to evolve exponentially. For instance, in the 19th
century, there existed 39 treaties between German States, and fewer with
foreign countries. While the early treaties solely provided for a comprehensive
mutual recognition of any judgment, the modern ones began to require additional
elaborate conditions such as timely notice, jurisdiction, and compatibility of
public policy with the enforcing State.
It was in the 20th century that we started to see
attempts to move beyond bilateral agreements to multilateral conventions. The
Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, originally announced in 1948, and
later revised in 1964 applied only to sister states in the US and federal
judgments. However, both the 1962 and 2005 Recognition Acts provided that, once
a foreign country judgment was recognised, it was enforceable in the same
manner and to the same extent as a sister state judgment.
In the late 1900s, the Hague convention intended to
develop a standardised procedure by which countries involved in international
commerce, could resolve conflicts in a forum where foreign judgments be
recognised and enforced by courts. Subsequently in 2005, the Uniform
Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act facilitated the recognition of a foreign judgment in United States of America Courts to provide legal certainty that helped aid the recognition and enforcement of United States judgments abroad.
In a contemporary today, we are privy to countries being
liberal in recognising and enforcing foreign judgments; thereby providing a
legally robust, revolutionary and enterprising platform to accelerate
cross-border trade and transactions throughout the world.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has a rich tapestry of
varied cultures and nationalities. And to ensure reciprocal recognition and
reinforcement of foreign judgment, spearheading the leadership’s progressive
vision, the UAE has signed several bilateral legal and judicial cooperation
treaties with countries like France, Afghanistan, Egypt, Jordan, Nigeria,
Morocco, India, Iran, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom, among others.
The UAE is also party to numerous multilateral
conventions on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, which
include the Riyadh Convention on the Judicial Cooperation between the States of
the Arab League 1983 (entered into without reservations) and the Gulf
Cooperation Council (GCC) Convention for the Execution of Judgments,
Delegations and Judicial Notifications of 1996 (entered into without
reservations). The enforcement of judgments follow different processes under each convention:
Riyadh Convention: A formal request must be made to the
competent court by the contracting party. Enforcement process begins after the request has been approved.
GCC Convention: The procedure is governed by the law of the
state where the judgment is executed. Important documentation includes true
copy of the judgment, a certificate declaring the judgment to be final and
documents, which confirms that the defendant was properly notified in cases
where ex-parte judgment is given.
Paris Convention: No specific legal framework has been
recognised. The application for recognition and enforcement of the foreign
judgment shall be submitted before the competent court of first instance within the jurisdiction in which the party wants to enforce the judgment by following the usual procedure of bringing a claim under article 235(2) of the UAE Civil Procedures Code.
The application of the above treaties entered into by the
UAE extends to the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts under
Article 24(2) of the DIFC Court Law. The DIFC Courts themselves have entered
into several memoranda of guidance related to reciprocal enforcement
arrangements with several courts and authorities, such as the UAE Ministry of
Justice, the Ras Al Khaimah Courts, the Federal Court of Australia, the Supreme Court of Singapore, the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Commercial Court of England and Wales.
Arabic is used as the official language in the Emirati
courts and any documentation submitted to the court must be translated and
certified by a legally-sworn translator licensed by the UAE Ministry of
Justice. However, proceedings in the DIFC and the recently established Abu
Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) are in English and in a historic move to ensure justice is accessible to all, Hindi has been included as the third official language by the ADGM.
Based on the amendment to Article 121, each Emirate
government is permitted to create its independent free zones. To encourage
trade and economic activities, a company established in any of the free zone is
permissible to have hundred per cent foreign ownership (among many other
benefits), in contrast to a requirement of an Emirati or local sponsor for a
company established outside any of the free zone. Since the DIFC was
established as a Financial Free Zone in the emirate of Dubai, the Dubai Law No
9/2004 recognizes the administrative and financial independence of DIFC. And therefore, DIFC Courts have their own civil and commercial laws strictly
structured on the principles of common law and international standards, where the legal independence is derived from Dubai and the federal laws; this makes DIFC a dominant free zone in the UAE, a favourable choice for foreign
The UAE’s decision to enter into these treaties and
memoranda leads us to the fact that the enforcement of foreign judgments in the
UAE is based on the provisions of the treaty that apply. When the UAE is party
to a treaty, whether bilateral or multilateral, the recognition and enforcement
of foreign judgments in the UAE will be followed as per the provisions of such
a treaty. However, in the absence of such a treaty, relevant provisions from
the UAE Civil Procedures Code take effect; specifically Articles 235 to 238 of
Federal Law No. 11 of 1992. UAE Courts recognise all judgments that correspond
to these treaties and prefer to emphasise requirements within treaties for
enforcing judgments rather than using civil procedure laws.
Article 235 of the UAE Civil Procedures Code provides all
the requirements for the recognition of foreign judgments, especially as
relevant to the Emirati UAE Courts, and it lays down the following conditions:
Article 235(1): the judgment creditor must prove that the
foreign state issuing the judgment for which enforcement is sought would also
agree to enforce a UAE court order/judgment.
Article 235(2)(a): the UAE Court will not enforce a
foreign judgment if it deems that it had original jurisdiction to hear the
dispute. The UAE Civil Procedures Code specifies instances in which the UAE
Courts are likely to claim original jurisdiction over a dispute (Articles 20,
21 and 33). The UAE has also provided a broad interpretation of the concept of
“original jurisdiction” for this purpose. For instance, the UAE Courts will
most likely claim jurisdiction in the event that a defendant has a place of
residence or domicile in the UAE. The same applies if the assets that
constitute the subject matter of the dispute are located in the UAE.
Article 235(2)(b): the UAE Courts will determine whether
the foreign judgment or order was issued by a court with jurisdiction in per
the law of its home jurisdiction.
Article 235(2)(c): the UAE Courts must examine the
service of process to ensure that it has been carried out in the correct
manner. Aspects such as the verification of the parties, whether they were duly
summoned to attend and had legal representation at the proceedings, are
especially emphasised. To satisfy this requirement, the judgment creditor must
submit an Arabic translation before the UAE courts.
Article 235(2)(e): there should be no conflicting
judgments and no violation of public policy and morals.
The UAE Courts establish whether the assets in dispute or
the contract that was performed are located within its jurisdiction. According
to the provisions of Article 235, the UAE courts in order to enforce the foreign
judgment, take into consideration the principle of reciprocity.
As per Article 235(2)(c) of the UAE Civil Procedures Code
requires for a proper service of proceeding: the UAE courts will look into the
service of process, specifically regarding the verification of the parties that
if they were properly summoned to attend and had legal representation at the
proceedings. To satisfy this requirement, the judgment creditor needs to submit
before the UAE courts an Arabic translation. As the UAE courts have a strict
interpretation of the requirements which are laid down in Article 235 of the
UAE Civil Procedures Code, it is implausible that the UAE courts may grant
enforcement of ex-parte foreign judgments or foreign default judgments.
Per Article 253(2)(d) it is stated that the foreign
judgment or order should be a final non appealable order or judgment.
There should be no conflicting judgment as per Article
There should be no violation of public policy and morals
as per stated under Article 235(2)(e)